Evaluation
You found this Infosheet to be:
|
![]() Éducaloi is a non-profit organization whose mission is to inform Quebecers of their rights and obligations by providing quality legal information in everyday language.
La loi vos droits
Clientele : Other Infosheets
Subject : Damages
Print date : February 9th, 2012
Other Infosheets
Dave is taking a relaxing dip in his swimming pool. Next door, his neighbour Nicolas is trimming the branches of his oak tree without paying too much attention to Dave. Suddenly, a branch lands right on Dave’s back.
Dave cries out in pain and hobbles out of the pool. He misses a whole week of work, losing his salary during that time. In pain and unable to sleep, he has to spend money on medication and transportation to doctors’ appointments. Does Nicolas have to pay for the damages Dave suffered? How does Dave prove what kind of damages he suffered? In this Infosheet, Éducaloi explains what “damages” are and how they are measured and proved in court.
"Damages" refers to the harm suffered by a person as a result of someone else’s fault. Damages are one of three things a person must prove when suing someone, along with fault and a connection between the fault and the damage.
There are two categories of damages: monetary and personal. A single fault can lead to both kinds of damages. Monetary Damages This category of damages relates to a person’s property and income. They are also called “material damages”. Here are some examples:
Personal Damages This category of damages relates to the person himself. It is divided into two sub-categories:
Here are some examples:
Violating someone’s rights sometimes falls into the category of personal damages. Here are some examples:
Only damages that are the direct result of someone else’s fault can be compensated for or repaired. There is therefore no right to compensation for damages that are the indirect result of someone else’s fault, or that result from your own fault.
For example, let’s say that Vivian is riding her bike down an alley a little too quickly and accidentally runs over the paw of Pistachio, a sleeping cat. Pistachio’s owner, Brian, can demand that Vivian compensate him for the veterinary bills for the cat’s injuries. But if Pistachio is attacked by another cat that same night, and because of the cast on his paw, Pistachio is less able to defend himself and is bitten on the ear, Vivian is not responsible for these indirect damages. Similarly, if Brian does not get his cat treated for his injuries and the injury to the paw becomes seriously infected, Vivian will not be responsible for this damage since it is a result of Brian’s fault and not her own. Damages Suffered in the Context of a Contract If the damages result from contractual fault (that is, a person did not respect commitments made in a contract), compensation is only available for damages that could have been anticipated when the contract was made: loss of profits, lost time, money spent to deal with the situation, etc. For example, let’s say that Louise hires Christian to install a new computer system for her business. Christian does not show up on the scheduled date. Louise can ask for money to compensate for the profits her business lost as a result of not having a computer system. However, Louise cannot be compensated for losing a client who was already looking for another supplier. Why? Because at the time the contract was signed, losing this client because of Christian’s failure to respect the contract was not damage that could have been anticipated. There is one exception to this rule: when the fault is intentional and especially serious, a person can be held responsible for all the damages suffered, and not just for the damages that could have been anticipated. See the question “If the fault is especially serious, does the compensation change?”
Compensation often takes the form of an amount of money equal to the damage suffered. The goal is to put the person who suffered damages back in the position he would have been in had the fault not occurred. The compensation therefore can’t be a way for the victim to become richer.
For example, in the case of Brian’s cat, which was injured by Vivian, Brian has to take a half-day off work (he will lose $150 in salary) and pay $500 in veterinary bills. He also has to put up with the inconvenience and stress of dealing with the situation. It’s difficult to put a figure on this, but Brian thinks $250 is a reasonable amount. To put Brian back in the position he would have been in before his cat was injured, Vivian therefore has to pay $900. This means that Brian can’t ask for $5,000, because the $4,100 extra would only serve to make him richer, not compensate for the damages he suffered. It is also possible to ask for compensation “in kind”. This means the person who committed the fault must do something to repair the damage instead of just paying money. However, this kind of compensation is not available in Small Claims Court. Compensation in kind can be combined with monetary compensation. For example, if the roots of a tree cause $1,000 in damage to a neighbour’s property, a judge can order the owner of the tree to cut it down and pay $1,000 to repair the property.
The person who did not respect the contract must provide compensation for the damages that could have been anticipated at the time the contract was made: loss of profits, lost time, money spent to deal with the situation, etc.
When the amount of money at stake is more than $7,000, it is also possible to ask the judge to order that any commitments made in the contract be respected, if this is still possible. These commitments can be carried out either by the person who did not respect them or by someone else, but at the expense of the person who did not respect the contract. It is also possible to simply cancel the contract. For example, Louise did not have a computer system for her business for 3 days because Christian did not show up on the date mentioned in their contract. In addition to monetary compensation (lost profits, etc.), Louise can ask that:
Monetary Damages
If the item is no longer useable, it is possible to ask for reimbursement of its value. The judge will take into account the condition of the item before it was damaged: a 5-year-old used car is not worth as much as a brand new car.
Anyone who misses work for a long period (3 months due to being hospitalized, for example) can present reports from doctors and actuaries showing the amount of future income that will be lost. All expenses relating to the damages (care, medication, services) can be reimbursed. Bills can be used to prove the amount of these expenses. For more information on monetary damages, read the question “What are damages?”. Personal Damages Monetary compensation is also available for personal damages, even if it is difficult to evaluate them in terms of money. Usually the judge decides on the amount of compensation for personal damages by looking at how severe they are. The level of severity is established by looking at similar cases, statements of witnesses and reports of medical and psychological experts.
It depends on the type of damages.
However, this kind of statement in a contract cannot be used to avoid responsibility for damages caused by intentional fault or extreme carelessness and negligence, also called “gross negligence”. For example, let’s say that Melodie takes legal proceedings against Justin Delivery Inc. because her new set of dishes arrived in a million pieces. The contract states that the delivery company is not responsible for damages to goods while they are being transported. This statement is in theory valid since the broken dishes fall under the category of monetary damages. But Melodie could get compensation anyways if she can prove that the delivery company intentionally broke the dishes or loaded the truck by throwing the boxes to the back despite that they were marked “fragile”.
Take the example of Carl, who goes to see a baseball game. On the back of his ticket, it says that the league is not responsible for injuries caused by balls hit into the stands. Carl is injured when a ball hits him in the head. If Carl can prove the league was at fault (it did not take any safety precautions, for example), the league will have to compensate Carl for his personal damages (pain, stress, etc.) despite what is printed on the back of the ticket. For more information on this, consult our infosheet Clauses Limiting Responsibility.
Yes. Intentional fault or gross negligence (extreme carelessness) can affect compensation. Here are some examples of what happens when there is intentional fault or gross negligence:
In the Context of a Contract
When the Person at Fault Would Not Normally Be Held Responsible
Insurance
Fundamental Rights
Éducaloi does not provide any legal advice or counseling. The information contained in its website constitutes a general source of information and does not in any way replace the services of a lawyer or notary.
|