Evaluation
You found this Infosheet to be:
|
Offenders and Accused Persons
An individual commits assault when he uses or threatens to use force against another, without that person’s consent. Assault is subdivided into different categories, such as sexual assault, assault with a weapon, and aggravated assault. Many different acts might qualify as assault.
In this Infosheet, Éducaloi describes the various types of assault, the legal defences against it, and how the law punishes assault convictions.
The Criminal Code gives a general definition of assault, which applies to different types of offences.
First, there is simple assault, for which a convicted person can serve a maximum prison sentence of 5 years. The Criminal Code sets out three ways in which the offence of simple assault may occur:
The Criminal Code has classified different assault offences according to the level of violence used, the context in which the violence occurred, or who the victim is. Here are the main offences:
The offence of assault with a weapon or causing bodily harm is committed when a person carries, uses, or threatens to use a weapon or an imitation (fake) weapon while committing assault. It is not necessary for the aggressor to actually use the weapon. It is enough that the aggressor has the weapon in his possession.
An assault causing bodily harm occurs when the victim is injured. Anyone convicted of committing these offences can be sentenced to a maximum prison term of 10 years.
This offence requires proof of assault against:
A person convicted of committing this offence can be sentenced to a maximum prison term of 5 years.
The offence of aggravated assault requires proof that the victim has been severely injured, mutilated, disfigured, or that his life was endangered by the aggressor. This offence includes excision and female genital mutilation. It carries a maximum prison sentence of 14 years.
According to the law, an assault claim cannot be made where the parties consented to the act. Consent is defined as agreeing to the harm. Consent is valid only if it is given of the person’s own free will.
According to the Criminal Code, consent is not valid if the victim agreed to the act because of:
In sports like boxing, football, or hockey, players consent to getting hit by other players. However, the courts have ruled that no person can consent to receiving blows causing serious injury or death while playing an aggressive sport. So even if a hockey player should expect to be checked against the boards during a game, if another player hits him in the face with a stick, this is assault. This same limit on consent applies outside the world of sports to other cases of violent combat.
In some cases, a person can claim to have sincerely believed that the other person had agreed to be harmed. For this type of defence to succeed, the accused must prove his good faith. He must show that he truly believed that the victim consented to the harm. If the aggressor simply acted without thinking or wasn’t sure that consent was given, he cannot use this type of defence.
If accused of assault, you can argue self-defence if the both of the following conditions apply:
According to the law, a person who excises, infibulates, or mutilates, in whole or in part, the labia majora, labia minora, or clitoris of a person is causing a wound or mutilation. Such a person can be accused of aggravated assault, except if the act occurs under the following circumstances:
Yes, this is considered to be a sexual assault. Sexual assault occurs when a person has sexual relations with someone without her consent. In this case, your consent is considered invalid because you probably wouldn't have made the same decision had you known your partner was HIV positive.
Moreover, the victim does not actually have to contract HIV for this to be considered an assault. It's enough that the person failed to disclose his illness. The same rule applies for all other serious sexually transmitted infections.
|